Endomorphin-2 analogs with C-terminal esterification display potent antinociceptive effects in the formalin pain test in mice.

Previously, we have investigated three C-terminal esterified endomorphin-2 (EM-2) analogs EM-2-Me, EM-2-Et and EM-2-Bu with methyl, ethyl and tert-butyl ester modifications, respectively. These analogs produced significant antinociception in acute pain at the spinal and supraspinal levels, with reduced tolerance and gastrointestinal side effects. The present study was undertaken to determine the analgesic effects and opioid mechanisms of these three analogs in the formalin pain test. Our results demonstrated that intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of 0.67-20 nmol EM-2 analogs EM-2-Me, EM-2-Et and EM-2-Bu produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in both phase Ⅰ and phase Ⅱ of formalin pain. EM-2-Me and EM-2-Bu displayed more potent antinociception than morphine. Especially, EM-2-Bu exhibited the highest antinociception in phase Ⅱ of formalin pain, with the ED50 value being 2.1 nmol. Naloxone (80 nmol, i.c.v.) completely antagonized the antinociceptive effects of EM-2-Me, EM-2-Et and EM-2-Bu (20 nmol, i.c.v.) in both phase I and phase Ⅱ of formalin pain, suggesting a central opioid mechanism. Nevertheless, the antinociception induced by EM-2-Me might be involved in the release of dynorphin A, which subsequently acted on κ- opioid receptor. EM-2-Bu produced the antinociception probably by the direct activation of both µ- and δ-opioid receptors. EM-2-Me, EM-2-Et and EM-2-Bu also produced significant analgesic effects after peripheral administration, and the central opioid receptors were involved. Furthermore, EM-2-Bu had no influence on the locomotor activity after i.c.v. injection. The present investigation demonstrated that C-terminal esterified modifications of EM-2 will be beneficial for developing novel therapeutics in formalin pain.

Novel endomorphin analogues CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 produce potent and long-lasting antinociception with a favourable side effect profile at the spinal level.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endomorphins have shown great promise as pharmaceutics for the treatment of pain. We have previously confirmed that novel endomorphin analogues CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 behaved as potent µ agonists and displayed potent antinociceptive activities at the supraspinal and peripheral levels. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the antinociceptive properties of CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 following intrathecal (i.t.) administration. Furthermore, their antinociceptive tolerance and opioid-like side effects were also determined. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The spinal antinociceptive effects of CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 were determined in a series of pain models, including acute radiant heat paw withdrawal test, spared nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain, complete Freund's adjuvant-induced inflammatory pain, visceral pain and formalin pain. Antinociceptive tolerance was evaluated in radiant heat paw withdrawal test. KEY RESULTS: Spinal administration of CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 produced potent and prolonged antinociceptive effects in acute pain. CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 may produce their antinociception through distinct µ receptor subtypes. These two analogues also exhibited significant analgesic activities in neuropathic, inflammatory, visceral and formalin pain at the spinal level. It is noteworthy that CEMR-1 showed non-tolerance-forming analgesic properties, while CEMR-2 exhibited substantially reduced antinociceptive tolerance. Furthermore, both analogues displayed no or reduced side effects on conditioned place preference response, physical dependence, locomotor activity and gastrointestinal transit. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present investigation demonstrated that CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 displayed potent and long-lasting antinociception with a favourable side effect profile at the spinal level. Therefore, CEMR-1 and CEMR-2 might serve as promising analgesic compounds with minimal opioid-like side effects.